Précis
In chapter’s nine through twelve of Mary Roach’s non-fiction work Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers (2003), Roach explores more of the various little-known contributions of human cadavers. In chapter nine of the book, she explores the removal of the head from the human body. Roach figures that it must be possible to communicate with the recently removed head in the first ten or so seconds after removal if one asks the head a question and then directs the head to blink back. Roach follows this chapter up with one on the fairly ancient concept of “medicinal cannibalism.” Medicinal cannibalism is fairly similar to the traditional definition of cannibalism except for the fact that the human flesh that is being enjoyed is human remains. In the eleventh chapter the author looks at alternative funerals. She furthers her knowledge by visiting the Colorado State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital to tour the dead animal freezer. In the final chapter of the book Roach explores what she would like to have done with her cadaver once she dies. While pondering this decision she reflects upon her entire journey including the various opinions that she was provided with along the way. All of Roach’s exploration and reflection throughout the book is significant because it makes people able to talk about a subject that was once thought to be taboo. With her wit and humor this topic suddenly becomes not only a topic to talk about but also one that comes about naturally.
Vocabulary
• Pronouncement- a formal or authoritative statement
• Fortitude- mental and emotional strength in facing difficulty
• Broughams- a four-wheeled, boxlike, closed carriage for two or four persons
• Elixir- a sweetened, aromatic solution of alcohol and water containing, or used as
a vehicle for, medicinal substances.
• Spittle- saliva or split
Tone
• Reflective
• Serious (compared to previous chapter)
• Informative
Rhetorical Strategies
• Telegraphic Sentence- “We must return to hanging” (page 200).
• Personification- “9:00 The donor’s head eagerly drank water or milk, and tugged as if trying to separate itself from the recipients body” (page 208).
• Enumeration- “Unlike Demikhov’s and Guthrie’s whole head transplants, these brains, lacking faces, and sensory organs, would live a life confined to memory and thought” (page 209).
• Simile- “There was a brain sliced like a loaf of bread and a head split in two so that you could see the labyrinths of the sinuses and the deep, secret source of the tongue” (Page 288).
• Rhetorical Question- “Do you know that it is not at all certain when a head is severed from the body by the guillotine that the feelings, personality and ego are instantaneously abolished…” (page 200)?
Discussion Questions
1. How does one maintain a clear conscience while eating the remains of another individual?
2. Why is this book so heavy in side notes, footnotes, and dashes within the sentence that emphasize importance points?
3. Would it be wise to have people that are thinking about having their bodies donated to science read this book?
Important Quotation
“It makes little sense to try and control what happens to your remains when you are no longer around to reap the joys or benefits of that control. People who make elaborate requests concerning disposition of their bodies are probably people who have trouble with the concept of not existing.” (page 290).